Meest innovatieve bedrijven 2019 – De Top 50
Al jaren als we het hebben over de meest innovatieve bedrijven, domineren technologiereuzen zoals Apple, Google-pappa Alphabet, Microsoft en Amazon de lijst. Volgens de meest recente ranking van Boston Consulting Group bezetten Google, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft en Samsung de top vijf. Lees meer…
Meest innovatieve bedrijven 2019 – De Top 50
Geen van deze eerste vijf bedrijven staan overigens de eerste tien op de lijst van Fast Company’s, ook een lijst meest innovatieve bedrijven. Apple, dat in 2018 bovenaan de lijst stond, zakte weg naar de 17e plek.
Volgens Fast Company slaagde Apple er niet in om nieuwe wegen in te slaan met hun apparaten. Vorig jaar stond Apple op de eerste plaats vanwege innovatieve met producten zoals iPhone X, AirPods en augmented reality.
Fast Company rangschikte de 50 meest innovatieve bedrijven op basis van ‘de grootste impact hebben op zowel de industrie als de cultuur’.
De Boston Consulting Group: ‘These companies are serial reinventors. Google constantly revises its algorithms and offerings. Amazon continuously invents new categories, services, models, and ways of engaging its customers. Microsoft has successfully transitioned from its longtime reliance on the Wintel partnership in PCs to become a cloud-based tech company. And IBM has reinvented itself multiple times, from mainframes to PCs to services to the cloud, AI, and platforms and ecosystems.’
Lees hier ->>> meer over innovatie op deze website…
Tabel: De Top 50 Meest innovatieve bedrijven 2019
EBIT = earnings before interest and tax, is een maatstaf voor de operationele inkomsten van een onderneming voor aftrek van rente (interest) en belasting (tax). Het wordt gedefinieerd als de omzet minus de kosten van gewone bedrijfsuitoefening, exclusief financiële baten en lasten en belastingen.
TSR = total shareholders return, is het gerealiseerde aandelenrendement.
R&D = Research and development, onderzoek en ontwikkeling
Winst +/- in %
EBIT +/- in %
TSR +/- in %
R&D +/- in %
1
Alphabet / Google
22.8
21.8
7.8
19.2
2
Amazon
30.8
–1.9
53.4
40.6
3
Apple
6.3
2.2
94.7
15.3
4
Microsoft
5.4
6.3
–1.5
8.8
5
Samsung
5.4
6.3
–1.5
8.8
6
Netflix
32.4
120.8
32.4
23.6
7
IBM
–1.0
–16.0
18.6
0.6
8
Facebook
47.1
61.7
43.0
32.5
9
Tesla
68.0
NA
62.8
65.2
10
Adidas
10.0
49.4
39.2
14.0
11
Boeing
–1.2
48.4
–4.0
–6.3
12
BASF
12.0
26.2
63.7
1.3
13
T-Mobile
9.0
50.3
36.2
NA
14
Johnson & Johnson
6.3
–7.1
NA
16.0
15
DowDuPont
29.7
24.2
53.3
33.2
16
Siemens
4.3
2.8
NA
9.1
17
Cisco Systems
–2.5
–1.8
30.8
–3.8
18
LG Electronics
10.9
84.5
22.3
–23.0
19
Vale
10.9
84.5
22.3
–23.0
20
JPMorgan Chase
14.7
29.5
NA
–1.1
21
McDonald’s
3.7
NA
47.4
NA
22
Marriott
–7.3
6.8
14.4
NA
23
Alibaba
45.5
43.3
7.7
NA
24
Bayer
56.5
65.5
55.1
23.7
25
AT&T
–25.1
–11.7
26.8
–6.8
| Winst +/- in % | EBIT +/- in % | TSR +/- in % | R&D +/- in % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alphabet / Google | 22.8 | 21.8 | 7.8 | 19.2 |
| 2 | Amazon | 30.8 | –1.9 | 53.4 | 40.6 |
| 3 | Apple | 6.3 | 2.2 | 94.7 | 15.3 |
| 4 | Microsoft | 5.4 | 6.3 | –1.5 | 8.8 |
| 5 | Samsung | 5.4 | 6.3 | –1.5 | 8.8 |
| 6 | Netflix | 32.4 | 120.8 | 32.4 | 23.6 |
| 7 | IBM | –1.0 | –16.0 | 18.6 | 0.6 |
| 8 | 47.1 | 61.7 | 43.0 | 32.5 | |
| 9 | Tesla | 68.0 | NA | 62.8 | 65.2 |
| 10 | Adidas | 10.0 | 49.4 | 39.2 | 14.0 |
| 11 | Boeing | –1.2 | 48.4 | –4.0 | –6.3 |
| 12 | BASF | 12.0 | 26.2 | 63.7 | 1.3 |
| 13 | T-Mobile | 9.0 | 50.3 | 36.2 | NA |
| 14 | Johnson & Johnson | 6.3 | –7.1 | NA | 16.0 |
| 15 | DowDuPont | 29.7 | 24.2 | 53.3 | 33.2 |
| 16 | Siemens | 4.3 | 2.8 | NA | 9.1 |
| 17 | Cisco Systems | –2.5 | –1.8 | 30.8 | –3.8 |
| 18 | LG Electronics | 10.9 | 84.5 | 22.3 | –23.0 |
| 19 | Vale | 10.9 | 84.5 | 22.3 | –23.0 |
| 20 | JPMorgan Chase | 14.7 | 29.5 | NA | –1.1 |
| 21 | McDonald’s | 3.7 | NA | 47.4 | NA |
| 22 | Marriott | –7.3 | 6.8 | 14.4 | NA |
| 23 | Alibaba | 45.5 | 43.3 | 7.7 | NA |
| 24 | Bayer | 56.5 | 65.5 | 55.1 | 23.7 |
| 25 | AT&T | –25.1 | –11.7 | 26.8 | –6.8 |
Zie hier de top 20 grootste hedgefondsen ter wereld 2022.
Winst +/- in %
EBIT +/- in %
TSR +/- in %
R&D +/- in %
26
Allianz
–2.0
–9.1
10.4
NA
27
BMW
4.7
49.8
–4.0
NA
28
SAP
4.8
5.0
7.7
NA
29
Philips
6.3
–2.0
7.7
10.1
30
Royal Dutch Shell
–27.5
–21.3
28.2
–14.8
31
AXA
30.6
446.7
64.5
–9.1
32
Unilever
4.4
–15.5
NA
NA
33
Salesforce
1.9
13.7
NA
–8.0
34
Pfizer
25.9
1.8
2.8
27.7
35
Stryker
–0.5
5.9
–3.8
–2.8
36
NTT Docomo
9.9
7.8
80.6
10.1
37
Toyota
1.3
19.9
2.4
NA
38
Volkswagen
–2.8
–30.1
22.0
NA
39
3M
6.2
0.8
37.3
NA
40
General Motors
5.1
1.5
32.9
6.2
41
Dell
–12.5
7.1
4.8
NA
42
Walmart
12.3
NA
NA
98.5
43
eBay
0.8
–5.6
–8.1
NA
44
HP Inc.
6.5
–2.6
19.9
9.9
45
ING
7.9
2.0
6.2
–1.6
46
BP
2.8
NA
35.7
NA
47
Daimler
30.7
164.1
28.4
NA
48
Huawei
7.2
2.4
34.9
12.3
49
Rio Tinto
NA
NA
26.0
NA
50
Hilton
18.5
93.4
8.3
NA
| Winst +/- in % | EBIT +/- in % | TSR +/- in % | R&D +/- in % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | Allianz | –2.0 | –9.1 | 10.4 | NA |
| 27 | BMW | 4.7 | 49.8 | –4.0 | NA |
| 28 | SAP | 4.8 | 5.0 | 7.7 | NA |
| 29 | Philips | 6.3 | –2.0 | 7.7 | 10.1 |
| 30 | Royal Dutch Shell | –27.5 | –21.3 | 28.2 | –14.8 |
| 31 | AXA | 30.6 | 446.7 | 64.5 | –9.1 |
| 32 | Unilever | 4.4 | –15.5 | NA | NA |
| 33 | Salesforce | 1.9 | 13.7 | NA | –8.0 |
| 34 | Pfizer | 25.9 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 27.7 |
| 35 | Stryker | –0.5 | 5.9 | –3.8 | –2.8 |
| 36 | NTT Docomo | 9.9 | 7.8 | 80.6 | 10.1 |
| 37 | Toyota | 1.3 | 19.9 | 2.4 | NA |
| 38 | Volkswagen | –2.8 | –30.1 | 22.0 | NA |
| 39 | 3M | 6.2 | 0.8 | 37.3 | NA |
| 40 | General Motors | 5.1 | 1.5 | 32.9 | 6.2 |
| 41 | Dell | –12.5 | 7.1 | 4.8 | NA |
| 42 | Walmart | 12.3 | NA | NA | 98.5 |
| 43 | eBay | 0.8 | –5.6 | –8.1 | NA |
| 44 | HP Inc. | 6.5 | –2.6 | 19.9 | 9.9 |
| 45 | ING | 7.9 | 2.0 | 6.2 | –1.6 |
| 46 | BP | 2.8 | NA | 35.7 | NA |
| 47 | Daimler | 30.7 | 164.1 | 28.4 | NA |
| 48 | Huawei | 7.2 | 2.4 | 34.9 | 12.3 |
| 49 | Rio Tinto | NA | NA | 26.0 | NA |
| 50 | Hilton | 18.5 | 93.4 | 8.3 | NA |
Zie hier de de top 20 PGI 2021 meest innovatieve steden ter wereld 2021.